Recently I read a book called 'The Crimean War' by Clive Ponting. The book re-examines the war and smashes many of the myths that we have been taught at school etc. which, despite being false, have found their way in to official history. In the book he included a chapter on nursing and Florence Nightingale. Here he exposed her as more of a beaurocrat than a nurse concerned with making an enhanced public image for herself rather than caring for her patients. He claims she did not instigate the reforms that led to better hospital conditions which in turn led to reduction in the spread of diseases but rather the reforms were alread planned prior to her arrival. Nor was she in charge of all nurses at Scutari but just a small number who in the main despised her. The Army opposed her but since she was well-connected she managed to get into the theatre of war. She was used by the Victorian media at a time when they desparately needed a heroine to counter the disasters of the War yet did not deserve the status she has been accorded by official history.
With this in mind I would like to start a discussion, for those interested, on Florence Nightingale. What do members think? Did she deserve her image that she has today or was the reality very far from the truth?
Mark

