FROGSMILE wrote:Yes mea culpa, you are both quite right. I had confused myself somehow when thinking in my mind of RWF and the USMC, when what I had read in HMS Terrible's book was that the "British contingent" (of the allied force) had, via confusion, been the first to reach the legation (and not 1 RWF). Here is the passage to which I was referring: http://archive.org/stream/commissionhms ... 6/mode/2up
Pages 288 and 289 refer, as do the 1st Sikhs and 7th Bengal Infantry.
grumpy wrote:FROGSMILE wrote:Yes mea culpa, you are both quite right. I had confused myself somehow when thinking in my mind of RWF and the USMC, when what I had read in HMS Terrible's book was that the "British contingent" (of the allied force) had, via confusion, been the first to reach the legation (and not 1 RWF). Here is the passage to which I was referring: http://archive.org/stream/commissionhms ... 6/mode/2up
Pages 288 and 289 refer, as do the 1st Sikhs and 7th Bengal Infantry.
mea culpa x 2!!!!!!!!
It was 2nd RWF, not 1st. The First battalion was busy sorting out the Boers at the time.

Josh&Historyland wrote:.... different I mean than just two or three allies going to war for the usual reasons ....
Return to China Wars 1842-1900
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest